Welcome to the AFK Mods bug tracker. In order to report an issue, you need to have a VALIDATED account to post one. Once you have followed the link the registration email sent you, please select a project from the drop down menu below. Select “Open New Issue” and fill out the form with as many details as possible.

Please also consider sending your bug report to Bethesda if you are reporting on an issue with Skyrim Special Edition, Fallout 4, or Starfield. Doing so will help everyone on all platforms.

Issue Data
Status: In Progress
Issue Type: Bug Report
Project: Unofficial Skyrim Special Edition Patch
Component: Skyrim SE: Vanilla
Category: Meshes
Assigned To: Nobody
Platform: All
Severity: Very Low
Votes: 0
Watching: N/A
Opened By DarthVitrial on Apr 18, 2024 5:25 pm
Last Edited By Arthmoor on Jul 8, 2024 11:01 pm

Issue #33966: Vanilla flora meshes not properly converted to SE

 
Several flora meshes still had NiTriShape instead of BsTriShapes, which would cause "Insufficient information to calculate tangents and bitangents. V: 0, N: 0, Tex: 0, Tris: 0" errors when trying to update tangent spaces. Reconverted them properly to SE format (and updated the tangent spaces). Will need testing.



Attached Files:

Plants.7z

Comments

2 comment(s)
Arthmoor said:
 
Are these supposed to be problems with old USSEP mesh conversions or actual issues with existing vanilla meshes?

For example, on floracanisroot01.nif, The actual visible mesh has one BSTriShape node, and one BSLODTriShape node in the unaltered vanilla file. There are no NiTriShape nodes.

This same file as submitted in the above archive has two BSTriShape nodes. I believe this is incorrect and will break the visible harvest state of the mesh.

And to make things even more interesting, USSEP doesn't even have a floracanisroot01.nif file.

Therefore I think everything in the offered archive needs to be double checked against vanilla meshes from the 1170 archives to see if these should even be used at all. It's entirely possible any USSEP versions of these also need to be thrown out if any of them have old block types.

DarthVitrial said:
 
It might be an issue with the existing ussep specific versions, yes. Comparisons are needed.

Showing Comments 1 - 2 of 2